BIRTH OF A NATION
BIRTH OF A NATION
Uhhh, yeah. Seeing Nat turner playing hide and seek with a
white boy in the beginning of Birth of a
Nation makes a lot of people scratch their heads. Weren’t white kids not
supposed to play with children of color? What do you think the director is
trying to portray here? During this time in Southampton County, VA, many slaves
along side Nat Turner wanted to fight their way to Jerusalem.
Since the beginning of Nat Turners time as a kid, he didn’t
really know right from wrong. He thought playing with the white children was a
normal thing. But little did he know things were changing. When Nat followed
his father in the middle of the night to steal food and the slave catchers
caught him and asked for his pass. Nat knew that things were going to change
when his father said he had to go and told Nat that he is a child of God. Even
as a young child, after seeing his mom be slapped and him being yelled at in
his face, he wanted change. His beliefs of God were strong once he was given a
bible, even when he started picking cotton from a young age.
Growing up religious, he then led mass gatherings in a barn
giving the word of the lord. Giving all the slave workers like himself hope.
Nat’s views changed drastically as he grew up. For example, him giving the lady
in the carriage a doll that her child dropped, or later him riding with his
master finding another slave shot and dead on the trial.
Besides the fact that Nat was going to different slave
masters houses to give the “word of the Lord”, what REALLY got him heated was
seeing a little white girl, leading a black slave girl on a leash, as if she
was a dog.
So many different situations are giving Nat the power and
ideas to start a slave rebellion. He just can’t take anymore of it. With fellow
slaves getting their teeth chiseled out of their mouth and being fed
forcefully, or the fact that his wife was beating severally bad by 3 men for
fetching water without a pass. Nat has just baptized a white man on Sam’s
property and is screaming scriptures off the top of his lungs and gets hit with
the butt end of a rifle, then whipped. This SURELY is the last straw for him to
start his rebellion a movement.
Nat gathers up 6 other slaves and tells them that they are
the chosen ones by God, and to wait for the Lords sign. When the time is right,
they are ready to strike. His motivation is his wife. Her telling him to fight
for her is everything he needs to rebel.
The Slave rebellion has begun. Killing Sam with an axe,
along with Nat’s other soldier beating the other white man. Their time has
finally come about. Going to different towns, killing off white slave owners and
trying to take everything they have.
So, what is the director trying to portray here? Is he also
giving an example of how another slave rebellions played out? Not to mention
the year Nat Turner was born, another man by the name of Gabriel Prosser also
led a slave rebellion.
-Fabian Carlon
I would like to hear some of your opinions on this. I have not seen this movie and this post sounds more like a plot summary than a conspiracy or analysis. If the director was trying to loosely recreate a slave rebellion it wouldn't be for a modern person to draw inspiration from as it is not a part of our society anymore. I can see how it could try and portray to people the way life was when slavery was present and have some historical context. I think it would be interesting if you dug more into this idea of recreation a true life event and see which rebellion you believe it to be representing the closest.
ReplyDelete