Nat Turner- Religious Superstition and Rebellion (Part 2 of 2)
Continuing from our last discussion, does Turner rebel?
The answer is yes, yes he does. In 1831 using
only knifes, axes, and hatches Turner and his rallied men set out to kill any
white slave owners they could find. They ended up killing non-slave owners too,
including women and children (Herbert, 1966). Throughout the night, Turners group of rebels
grew; first a dozen, then possibly grew as high as 80 rebellious slaves. They
killed approximately 60 people on their crusade. The rebellion ended after two
days when a local militia with twice the manpower defeated them. In the end, as
many as 200 African-Americans were killed and later, 56 African-Americans were
executed by the state (Herbert, 1966).
As for Turner? He escaped only to
be found hiding in a cave. He was put on trial and pled not guilty, not because
he did not do it, but because he felt no remorse for his actions. Later, Turner
was executed and hung.
We see a continuous theme
throughout history that is linked to religion. While religion can be empowering
and give believers a since of purpose, it can also be misleading. In this
instance, Turners beliefs fueled his plot to overthrow slave owners and free
all slaves. Many people, then and now, would agree this needed to be done. However,
was murdering innocent women and children in the process necessary? This conspiracy
is a classic example of how religious dogma, such as Turners visions of God
talking to him, can be misunderstood. He contemplated and executed this plan without
considering how the children were innocent because his religious beliefs
clouded his judgment.
- Savannah Fillion
Missed part one of this blog? No problem, click here: http://hi360conspiracy.blogspot.com/2018/02/nat-turner-religious-superstition-and.html
Missed part one of this blog? No problem, click here: http://hi360conspiracy.blogspot.com/2018/02/nat-turner-religious-superstition-and.html
Work
Cited
Herbert, A.
(1966). Nat Turner’s Slave Rebellion.
New York: Prometheus Books
While I can understand his motive, I don't think he really thought his plan through. He was an educated man and if he really thought a mass murder would lead to abolishment of slavery he overestimated himself. His warfare mentality is what causes deaths on both sides and if his revolution took a different form at this time it may have been more affective. I do take into account however, that in a lifestyle like that, this option seems like the only viable one. His religion may have been the cause of his false sense of power and security but his fight against injustice was not done in a way in which he could win.
ReplyDelete